Took class with DESMOND RICHARDSON. THE Desmond Richardson. Almost as cool as Liza. But – who am I kidding – not quite.
Tweet out?
Took class with DESMOND RICHARDSON. THE Desmond Richardson. Almost as cool as Liza. But – who am I kidding – not quite.
Tweet out?
01:07 PM in Liza Minelli | Permalink | Comments (0)
Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens.
The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?
These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology — informally known as the United States’ Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:
• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force.
Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things.
Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed.
again, full story here.
*****
Also, Michelle Malkin supplemented this story with a straightforward, disturbing video.
Extermination of "undesirables?" Ring a bell?
01:02 PM in Current Affairs, John Holdren, Science!, Trouble | Permalink | Comments (1)
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s loose cheeks just got a whole lot looser. (Is looser even a word? I suppose it’s not.)
You may want to sit down for this one.
This past Tuesday Justice Ginsburg – the same woman who won the 1999 Marshall Award for her contributions to gender equality and civil rights – told the New York Times that the landmark decision Roe v. Wade hinged on the Supreme Court majority's desire to diminish populations that we don't want to have too many of." The full interview will follow below, in just a minute.
I should preface Ginsburg’s remarks with a little bit of background information on Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood), so that Ginsburg's egenics references do not strike you as outlandish and absurd. Eugenics – all of its racism and evil intentions – are, and always have been, at the heart of the pro-abortion movement. This is not breaking news.
Time to slap down some Sanger101:
Sanger’s original motto Planned Parenthood was “Creating
a Race of Thoroughbreds.” It reveals
what no one will admit anymore: eugenics wasn’t just a side hobby for Sanger—it
is the very core of her abortion propagation. In her own
words (and truly, the woman has so many blatantly revealing statements), she
would use birth control to eliminate “the dead weight of human waste”.
Sanger mourned the fact that
medical technology of the day was wasted by keeping the weak and the sickly
alive to procreate. She devoted herself to preventing fertility in the
physically and mentally “defective,” and wrote off anything else as weak
“sentimentalism”. To our humanitarian Sanger, the greatest achievement of
her Birth Control campaign would be to stop “morons and imbeciles” (her choice
of vocabulary, not mine) from having children.
Eugenics with a vengeance was the name of her creepy little game. “We prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feebleminded,” Sanger said. Sanger harbored a racist hatred for minority groups, and she actively encouraged African-American Ministers to preach abortion rights to black community churches with the hopes of eliminating these people she disgustingly called “socially undesirable people.” The lady of the hour was quoted saying: "The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Sanger is often hailed as the “Champion of Women’s Rights.” Puhlease. What an insult to women.
Even though abortion activists have rewritten Margaret Sanger’s biography, her ideals remain indelibly fixed at the center of her the reproductive rights movement. If Sanger were to come back to earth for a visit, I'm sure she’d be delighted to see our society of abortion, contraception, forced sterilization, euthanasia, racial prejudice, animosity towards God and religion, reprogenics (manipulating qualities in the baby, like sex selection, blood type, talents and physicality in order to create 'designer children'), and the sky-rocketng minority abortion rates.
I am not being naïve. I have many dear pro-choice friends who'd writhe at the very thought of eugenics. But that’s the point: the founders and leaders of reproductive rights work to keep supporters unaware. Their black-tar agenda is as thick and utterly confounding as it is dark. And they do not authentically care about the well-being of women and minorities.
But don't take it from me. Take it from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:
Q: If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda? Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.
Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women? .
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. {The ruling she's referencing is Harris v. McRae, which forbade using medicaid to cover abortions.
For shame, Justice Ginsburg. This kind of disrespect for human life knows no bounds.
I read something of Flannery O’Connor’s once that I’ll never forget: “The truth doesn’t change according to our ability to stomach it." Abortion and its advocates are up to no good, and the proof is all here. Ya dig?
04:10 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
The intrepid Lila Rose is undercover again. You may remember her past videos exposing Planned Parenthood's willingness to take money from people spitting racist bile.
04:55 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
09:33 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
MPower Pictures, the same company that produced the beautiful film Bella, have done it again. Everything these filmmakers touch, turns to gold. It is a compassionate, deeply human depiction of the suffering of an Iranian woman. Jarringly recent (1986), the movie tells the true story of Soraya, whose arranged marriage to an abusive man, lead to a terrible unjust end. The movie stands as protest against the acts of brutality and injustice committed against women throughout the world.
11:59 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Jimmy Carter took a little trip to Gaza this week.
He whispered sweet, destructive nothings in Palestinian ears.
How hasn't he caught on? All that groveling still gets him no where.
02:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (5)
American healthcare is the best in the world. Our cancer survival rates put Europe and Canada's to shame. Non-Americans in need of specialized care come HERE when they want the best. It isn't perfect, but that doesn't detract from the fact that American medical care is envied throughout the world. The megalithic arrogance of this man to think he can put his hands all over it! To throw that all away for a socialist system? It is inconceivable to me. Does it stun and scare you too?
01:59 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
06:10 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Welcome to a new level of insanity and injustice.
03:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (5)
Sam Witt write a great article on poetry at the University of Virginia (as well as poetry's transcendent societal role in general). If you are interested (and I hope you are!) read the article linked below. It revolves around UVA's community of famous poets and a couple of UVA's MFA writers. As a member of the undergraduate poetry program, these are the writers we get to learn from every day. They are tremendous. As usual, their reverence for poetry's particular function of human expression is such a beautiful thing to hear/be a part of.
02:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Spring Sweethearts!
09:59 AM | Permalink | Comments (5)
Veggie
Boy
With apologies to the
incisors’
noble effort each meal,
the way you eat that
salad…
odes to your
bicuspids
practically compose
themselves.
Cherry tomatoes never looked so virile.
Somewhere on a farm
nearby
grateful little piggies
lounge free.
In candlelight your jaw
muscles a French
baguette – the chickens
unite, and approve.
Herbivore,
you smell like onion
and I like it.
That breath don’t make me
cry.
Smile and I’m beet
red. Speak: the bell peppers
begin to ring.
Careful! Gentle –
that upper lip could
split
me open, ripe, sweet pecan.
05:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Angel
Gabriel
Sometimes the Angel
Gabriel appears in a burst
of feathers at my
door. Carrying a bent lily
he stops for
pomegranate tea
after a sad day on the job.
I bring out my whitest
china
but sit a few feet
back because his glow
is
like the equator at sunset
and really does a number on
the eyes.
Sometimes the hem of his
robe is singed
so
he explains how gentleness is
a
pseudo-insurrectionary fight. That
love’s become
the cause of
vigilantes
He, Michael, Rafael –
guerilla rank and file.
Sometimes Gabriel talks
about a baby
girl he couldn’t
save. How the blade
spun like
propellers of a warplane.
How he can’t sleep
because he sees her
scattered like jagged
pink seashells
when he
shuts his eyes.
Sometimes he describes
heartbeats:
fragilely
mighty, or mightily fragile
depending on their owners.
Strung
together, one opal, then another.
Moving like the tops of trees
in a windstorm.
But most of the time
Gabriel can’t say
anything at all. He
cries archangel-sized tears
and what
looks like glitter
shakes lose from his hair.
So we sit. Let the tea-steam wrap
around his halo.
Then he picks up that
broken lily
and wanders, like a heavy
mist, down my street.
09:37 AM | Permalink | Comments (11)
OK
Senator Tom Coburn gave this stirring speech, speaking out for about the
infuriating Omnibus Appropriations Act. Finally, someone
speaking out about this bill that puts "politicians first, and the people
last," and how President Obama is violating his every promise to the
American people. How no one is permitting amendments and changes to a bill that
will affect our future and our children's and our children's children's future.
Please give his words a couple minutes of your time; arm yourselves with
legitimate anger at this colossal $pending; how we and our future families are
being made subservient to crooked and greedy political agendas.
(I still can't embed videos, so this link will take you straight to the video:)
09:06 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Oh dear. Forgive me, but typepad changed their format for posting, and it has had me baffled to the extreme. I cant figure out how to embed youtube videos, or even link URLs, so I apologize for my extreme silence. I've just been so frustrated with the format and my fruitless attempts to supply you lovelies with the scintillating bevy of articles and videos I've run across. I realize that it's less typepad.com's fault than my own stubborn inability to grasp even the most simple of technologies.
01:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
The Going Galt phenomenon only continues to pick up the pace. I come bearing picture a la Ms. Malkin. Some of the pictures are straight up sassy. (High praise!)
These pictures are from some stimulus protests and rallies -- it's no surprise the media has been ignoring these statements. Since our news sources are keeping this stuff to their chests, care to spread around the word yourself?
04:32 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)
Here is a sobering article--- In spite of mistakes in office and all the abuse he fielded from the world, nevertheless George Bush implemented policies and institutions that kept the US safe from the constant threat of Al Quaeda--policies that while campaigning, Obama promised to do away with. Bush left office having kept America safe from perpetual terrorist threats for 2,688 days. The article discusses that if Obama wants to leave office with a similarly successful record, then he had best rethink his sonorous, idealistic promises to the American public, step out of liberal la-la land, and demonstrate his loyalty to the protection of the America public like he swore he would.
During the campaign, Obama described the techniques used to prevent these attacks as "torture." He promised that if elected, he would "have the Army Field Manual govern interrogation techniques for all United States Government personnel and contractors." If he follows through, he will effectively kill a program that stopped al-Qaeda from launching another Sept. 11-style attack. It was easy for Obama the candidate to criticize the CIA program. But as president, what will he do when the next senior al-Qaeda leader -- with actionable intelligence on plots to strike our homeland -- is captured and refuses to talk? Will the president allow the CIA to question this terrorist using enhanced interrogation techniques? If Obama refuses and our country is attacked, he will bear responsibility.
Consider also the National Security Agency's program to monitor foreign terrorist communications. In the Senate, Obama voted against confirming then-NSA Director Michael Hayden to lead the CIA because, in Obama's words, Hayden was "the architect and chief defender of a program of wiretapping and collection of phone records outside of FISA oversight." In 2007, Obama voted against the Protect America Act, which temporarily authorized the NSA program. Last year, he promised to filibuster a long-term authorization but at the last minute switched his vote. He explained that he still wanted to make changes to the law, including stripping out immunity for telecommunications companies for their cooperation with the NSA -- which would effectively kill the program. And he promised that "once I'm sworn in as President . . . my Attorney General [will] conduct a comprehensive review of all our surveillance programs, and . . . make further recommendations on any steps needed to preserve civil liberties."
09:34 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Today in this freezing weather, Washington DC's Constitution Ave is PACKED with prolife Americans who've arrived from all over to attend the 2009 March for Life. 49,551,703 children have been lost to abortion's violent "right." Please pray for the Marchers today, pray for the condemned unborn they are attempting to protect, pray for the already brutalized 50 million, and pray that the stirring, poignant sight of the March will change hearts.
Unlike the saturation of media coverage at the historical inaugueration just two days ago, our dependably shady media will pretend like this huge turnout never even happened. Its injustice is disgusting, but hopefully not disheartening. With the advent of this new administration, now is the time for us, as individuals, to sususpend our inhibitions, to clearly and bravely (but, ahem, politely) speak out for what we know is true. In absolutely any way we can!
03:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)
Merry Belated Christmas!
It has been a rough couple months, but I'm hereby calling Peace Be Still back into frequent action. It will be buzzing like never before, I promise you that.
To kick Peace's new beginning and the newly unwrapped year off right, I'm turning things over to the absurdly talented and poignant work of Alison Townsend. This poem is like nothing I've read before, and I hope it carves its message into your heart the way it did to mine.
be seeing you,
--Peace
What I Never Told You About the Abortion
That it hurt, despite the anesthetic,
which they administered with a long needle, shot straight into the womb.
That they hit the vagus nerve the first time and I fell down when I tried to stand.
That after the second shot my legs snapped shut--
instinctively as any wild mother protecting chick, kit, cub.
That I held the hand of a young Hispanic nurse and wept
when she said, "You know, hon, you don't have to do this."
That I believed I did, though I nearly got up and left.
That the doctor was crude, saying (when he saw me conscious),
"It's always the ones who want to be awake who should be put out."
That dilation and curettage is exactly what it sounds like:
opening, scraping, digging out a scrap of tissue that clings.
That mothers both create and take life. That I crossed a picket line
to get into the clinic. That I wanted to come back another day
but knew if I left then I wouldn't return. That my mind was not,
as I let you believe made up that night at Planned Parenthood,
the positive lab slip shining in my hand like a ticket to heaven.
That this was where the deep root of sadness began to take hold.
That I stood in our bedroom a few days before the "procedure,"
my blouse open and bra undone, looking at my breasts, marveling
at the way they swelled, even at eight weeks, like fruit I'd never seen,
remembering the rise and fall of my mother's body as she nursed my sister.
That I felt inhabited then. Incarnate, the cells of my skin glowing,
bright and scared. That I wished we were married, though it seemed uncool.
That I wished you'd said "A baby? Let's do it!"
instead of "It's your body. You decide."
That it was all surgical and neat, not even
any blood afterward on the Kotex that made me feel fourteen.
That I dreamed of it for weeks. That we married years later, that dream
torn between us. That I had wanted to feel the hard bowl of my belly.
That I believed it was practical--you in grad school,
no health insurance, me the one with a job.
That the table I lay on was cold. That there was a poster
of a kitten dangling from a tree limb, with the words "Hang in there, baby"
on the ceiling above me. That I turned names
over and over in my head like bright stones:
Caitlin, Phoebe, Rebecca, Siobhan.
That the nurse wept with me, like some twentieth-century
Southern Californian fate, midwife to death
in her uniform printed with flowers.
That she wrapped my hands in her navy blue sweater.
That I described the thumb-size embryo inside me in all the obvious ways --
shrimp, peanut, little bud-wanting-to-open.
But not baby, never baby.
That I saved the paperwork as proof I'd been admitted
to the college of mothers. That I told you a good story,
letting you believe I believed I might not be able to write with a child,
that this was the beginning of the end of us.
That though we are kind now, and always cordial when we meet,
a decade after our divorce, it is the one thing I cannot forgive you.
That it has taken me twenty years to find words for this story.
That no matter how many thats I write, there are not--will never be--enough.
-Alison Townsend
07:55 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
Vermont, Early November
It was in between seasons,
after the thin twitter of late autumn
but before the icy authority of winter,
and I took in the scene from a porch,
a tableau of silo and weathervane
and a crowd of ferns on the edge of the woods--
nothing worth writing about really,
but it is too late to stop now
that the ferns and silo have been mentioned.
I drank my warm coffee
and took note of the disused tractor
and the lopsided sign to the cheese factory.
Not one of those mornings
that makes you want to seize the day,
not even enough glory to make you want
to grasp every other day
yet after staring for a while
at the plowed-under fields and the sky,
I turned back to the order of the kitchen
determined to seize firmly
the second Wednesday of every month that lay ahead.
Billy Collins
05:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (4)
The other day, an Obama-supporting teacher of mine, whom I will not name, told our class gleefully that "The days of capitalism are fast ending, and you know what comes next..."
Someone in our small class snorted a skeptical, "uh, socialism."
The teacher didn't respond, but looked at them with a nod and a smile, with a kind of x-induced euphoric gleam.
Whenever conservatives bring up Obama's undeniable socialist jargon and ties to frightening figures like Saul Alinsky, they are never able to refute it, and they don't even care enough to look into it. They say we're ridiculous and out of line for making rude, insane accusations, and that we are no better than that 'damned' Mccarthy. These days, our political allegiances are so iron bound and prideful, that the possibility that our presidential candidate may just plan to "redistribute the wealth" goes unexamined. When McCain's political ad about Obama's ties to political wack-job extremist Bill Ayers was shown in a class of mine, the ad's message as a credible possibility was not even discussed. Instead, my teacher, who is close friends with Bill Ayers, kept calling him "Billy," and reminisced about how great he was.
Andrew Abela, PhD. puts it very well:
Redistribution of wealth is, plain and simple, taking from those who have more and giving to those who have less. Or, in the words of Karl Marx: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." The biggest problem with this approach is that once those on the receiving side become a large voting bloc, the temptation for government to keep increasing taxes on the rest to satisfy that bloc is almost irresistible, and so taxes just keep increasing. I lived in Canada for many years, so I know this first hand.Vote against Senator Obama because he is not willing to do anything to save
the babies. And vote against him also because you'll be taking home less
money after tax in order to feed, clothe, house, and educate your own
babies.When you meet the souls of the millions of dead babies in the next life, do
you think you will be able to face them and say to them that you did not use
your vote to try to help them, because you think that the day when abortion
will be illegal again in the US "may have passed us forever"?
04:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (8)
a couple articles:
Obama says that he would bankrupt the coal industry if they try to open any new, clean burning energy plants.
And here is Biden's opinion.
WHAT?? Consider all the railroads, dock workers, etc., who depend directly on the coal industry. This man is the worst thing that could happen to this country. Keep storming heaven for tomorrow.
03:54 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)